A Course Forum for Students in: Dynamics of the Global Wine Industry (GSBGEN 356)
Stanford GSB

Monday, January 11, 2016
Riedel and the science of the varietal-specific glass
Tempe Reichardt’s comment about Austrian glassmaker Riedel inventing the varietal-specific glass spurred me to look into the concept’s history. And Tempe was right: Riedel (or more specifically, former CEO and father of current CEO Claus Josef Riedel) came up with the idea of the varietal-specific glass in 1958, with the introduction of the Burgundy Grand Cru glass in 1958. That glass holds 37 ounces of liquid, almost 50% more than an entire standard bottle of wine. It’s now in MOMA’s permanent collection.
Riedel used that glass as a springboard into a dizzying variety of different glasses for different varieties of wine and, today, other liquors. The varietal-specific glass has come to define the company, even becoming part of Riedel’s tagline. They now offer more than 10 glass shapes for wine alone, ranging from new world shiraz to oaked chardonnay. And for the varietal-specific skeptics, Riedel runs tasting seminars to demonstrate the power of their glasses, one of which convincedthe New York Times.
But is there scientific evidence to back up Riedel’s formidable marketing? Although the company claims to do extensive scientific analysis to come up with its glass shapes, few if any independent studies confirm the concept. A 2000 study found that glasses, including a standard water glass, had only very subtle effects when non-expert wine drinkers smelled wine without touching or seeing the glass. That suggests that the differences people perceive when actually using different glasses are driven mainly by visual and tactile cues or by suggestion, not by the aromatic effects that glassmakers often cite. So an elegant glass like Reidel’s or Gabriel Glas’s may indeed make wine taste better, but perhaps not for the reasons you’d expect.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I think you make a worthwhile point here that "perceived quality" may play a significant or even dominant role here. However, I think there are two points to maybe push back a little on. Using non-expert wine drinkers for the 2000 study may have provided markedly different results from any study utilizing expert, or at least sophisticated/educated, wine drinkers. Second, the four glasses used do provide a range, and the standard water glass is an instructive foil to the more romanticized wine glass types, but it is still possible that the Riedel glass, which is different from these, may have hit some sweet spot of design. Not totally clear to me, though.
ReplyDeleteI think you make a worthwhile point here that "perceived quality" may play a significant or even dominant role here. However, I think there are two points to maybe push back a little on. Using non-expert wine drinkers for the 2000 study may have provided markedly different results from any study utilizing expert, or at least sophisticated/educated, wine drinkers. Second, the four glasses used do provide a range, and the standard water glass is an instructive foil to the more romanticized wine glass types, but it is still possible that the Riedel glass, which is different from these, may have hit some sweet spot of design. Not totally clear to me, though.
ReplyDelete